The new cross

The new cross is not opposed to the human race; rather, it is a friendly pal and, if understood aright, it is the source of oceans of good clean fun and innocent enjoyment. It lets Adam live without interference. His life motivation is unchanged; he still lives for his own pleasure, only now he takes delight in singing choruses and watching religious movies instead of singing bawdy songs and drinking hard liquor.

The new cross encourages a new and entirely different evangelistic approach. The evangelist does not demand abnegation of the old life before a new life can be received. He preaches not contrasts but similarities. He seeks to key into public interest by showing that Christianity makes no unpleasant demands; rather, it offers the same thing the world does, only on a higher level.

The new cross does not slay the sinner, it redirects him. It gears him into a cleaner anal jollier way of living and saves his self-respect.

The philosophy back of this kind of thing may be sincere but its sincerity does not save it from being false. It is false because it is blind. It misses completely the whole meaning of the cross. The old cross is a symbol of death. It stands for the abrupt, violent end of a human being. The man in Roman times who took up his cross and started down the road had already said good-by to his friends. He was not coming back. He was going out to have it ended.

Man: The Dwelling Place of God

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 comments
  • Although the resurrection of Jesus transformed the cross into a symbol of hope, it remains a symbol of sacrifice as well. A myopic focus on only the hope leaves many a blessing unexplored. Without recognizing the sacrifice, the hope has no foundation. Hope needs to be tethered in order to metamorphize into faith, otherwise, that hope is at the mercy of the winds.